<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quickbits April 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.humanitarian.info/2009/04/28/quickbits-april-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.humanitarian.info/2009/04/28/quickbits-april-2009/</link>
	<description>because information can save lives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:15:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Longley</title>
		<link>http://www.humanitarian.info/2009/04/28/quickbits-april-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-256348</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Longley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humanitarian.info/?p=609#comment-256348</guid>
		<description>@Paul: &quot;Lesson for the month: donâ€™t imagine that the UN has any more of a clue than anybody else about big numbersâ€¦&quot;

Too true - only a few people have Big Numbers expertise in this area, but they have documented their techniques exceptionally well. The question &quot;how many died?&quot; is the first thing anyone with any curiousity asks, but what is the actual value of knowing a Big Number? They&#039;re &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3751&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;meaningless to regular joes&lt;/a&gt;, and unless care is taken to accurately source the data, weed out duplicates and correct &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hrdag.org/resources/core_concepts.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;known biases&lt;/a&gt;, the number is almost certainly wrong.

For a masterclass in how to go about a definitive body count, check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://shr.aaas.org/peru/aaas_peru_5.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; How many Peruvians have died? An estimate of the total number of victims killed or disappeared in the armed internal conflict between 1980 and 2000&quot;&lt;/a&gt; by Prof David Sulmont et al.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul: &#8220;Lesson for the month: donâ€™t imagine that the UN has any more of a clue than anybody else about big numbersâ€¦&#8221;</p>
<p>Too true &#8211; only a few people have Big Numbers expertise in this area, but they have documented their techniques exceptionally well. The question &#8220;how many died?&#8221; is the first thing anyone with any curiousity asks, but what is the actual value of knowing a Big Number? They&#8217;re <a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3751" rel="nofollow">meaningless to regular joes</a>, and unless care is taken to accurately source the data, weed out duplicates and correct <a href="http://www.hrdag.org/resources/core_concepts.shtml" rel="nofollow">known biases</a>, the number is almost certainly wrong.</p>
<p>For a masterclass in how to go about a definitive body count, check out <a href="http://shr.aaas.org/peru/aaas_peru_5.pdf" rel="nofollow"> How many Peruvians have died? An estimate of the total number of victims killed or disappeared in the armed internal conflict between 1980 and 2000&#8243;</a> by Prof David Sulmont et al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

