<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pass the security cube (a.k.a. No Bullets Involved Part 3)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.humanitarian.info/2008/03/25/pass-the-security-cube-aka-no-bullets-involved-part-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.humanitarian.info/2008/03/25/pass-the-security-cube-aka-no-bullets-involved-part-3/</link>
	<description>because information can save lives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:15:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Longley</title>
		<link>http://www.humanitarian.info/2008/03/25/pass-the-security-cube-aka-no-bullets-involved-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-206709</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Longley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humanitarian.info/2008/03/25/pass-the-security-cube-aka-no-bullets-involved-part-3/#comment-206709</guid>
		<description>Hey John - Thanks for commenting. I&#039;ve found your eponymous cube exceptionally helpful over the last year, working with human rights organisations. It&#039;s very accessible, and provokes well-structured, focussed discussion.

Not that it&#039;s a race, but the human rights sector should be way in front of the humanitarians in realising the importance of information assurance, having quite well-worked resources like those produced for Front Line Defenders by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.frontlinedefenders.org/manuals/protection&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Enrique Eguren&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.frontlinedefenders.org/manual/en/esecman/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dmitri Vitaliev&lt;/a&gt;, and systems like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.martus.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Martus&lt;/a&gt; (which despite its limitations, is still the best replacement for a paper incident form so far devised, but that&#039;s another post). However, opportunity to improve doesn&#039;t necesarily translate into imrpovements, and I reckon we remain as vulnerable to complacency and over-optimism about tech security as the next chump, sadly, as Sanjana &lt;a href=&quot;http://ict4peace.wordpress.com/2008/06/01/it-security-planning-for-the-lack-of-commonsense/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recently demonstrated&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John &#8211; Thanks for commenting. I&#8217;ve found your eponymous cube exceptionally helpful over the last year, working with human rights organisations. It&#8217;s very accessible, and provokes well-structured, focussed discussion.</p>
<p>Not that it&#8217;s a race, but the human rights sector should be way in front of the humanitarians in realising the importance of information assurance, having quite well-worked resources like those produced for Front Line Defenders by <a href="http://www.frontlinedefenders.org/manuals/protection" rel="nofollow">Enrique Eguren</a> and <a href="http://www.frontlinedefenders.org/manual/en/esecman/" rel="nofollow">Dmitri Vitaliev</a>, and systems like <a href="http://www.martus.org/" rel="nofollow">Martus</a> (which despite its limitations, is still the best replacement for a paper incident form so far devised, but that&#8217;s another post). However, opportunity to improve doesn&#8217;t necesarily translate into imrpovements, and I reckon we remain as vulnerable to complacency and over-optimism about tech security as the next chump, sadly, as Sanjana <a href="http://ict4peace.wordpress.com/2008/06/01/it-security-planning-for-the-lack-of-commonsense/" rel="nofollow">recently demonstrated</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McCumber</title>
		<link>http://www.humanitarian.info/2008/03/25/pass-the-security-cube-aka-no-bullets-involved-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-206668</link>
		<dc:creator>John McCumber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humanitarian.info/2008/03/25/pass-the-security-cube-aka-no-bullets-involved-part-3/#comment-206668</guid>
		<description>Nice.  

I&#039;d be happy to show how it integrates.  As a technology-independent model, the infamous cubes works at a level of abtraction just above the technology layer.  That is why the model (originally published in 1991) remains relevant even as technology changes.

You cannot solve policy probelms with technology, nor conversely, can you solve your technology problems with policy.  The wisdom lies in knowing the difference.

~  John McCumber</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d be happy to show how it integrates.  As a technology-independent model, the infamous cubes works at a level of abtraction just above the technology layer.  That is why the model (originally published in 1991) remains relevant even as technology changes.</p>
<p>You cannot solve policy probelms with technology, nor conversely, can you solve your technology problems with policy.  The wisdom lies in knowing the difference.</p>
<p>~  John McCumber</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

