<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: William Easterly versus the World (Bank)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.humanitarian.info/2006/04/06/william-easterley-versus-the-world-bank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.humanitarian.info/2006/04/06/william-easterley-versus-the-world-bank/</link>
	<description>because information can save lives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:58:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.humanitarian.info/2006/04/06/william-easterley-versus-the-world-bank/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 09:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humanitarian.info/2006/04/06/william-easterley-versus-the-world-bank/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>There is a lot of opinions on the WBG&#039;s private sector development blog. Here&#039;s one: 

http://psdblog.worldbank.org/psdblog/2006/04/why_doesnt_aid_.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a lot of opinions on the WBG&#8217;s private sector development blog. Here&#8217;s one: </p>
<p><a href="http://psdblog.worldbank.org/psdblog/2006/04/why_doesnt_aid_.html" rel="nofollow">http://psdblog.worldbank.org/psdblog/2006/04/why_doesnt_aid_.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Currion</title>
		<link>http://www.humanitarian.info/2006/04/06/william-easterley-versus-the-world-bank/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Currion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 03:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humanitarian.info/2006/04/06/william-easterley-versus-the-world-bank/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re right in his analysis, and it strikes me that a lot of his critics have got Easterly wrong on that count.  I&#039;ve got no love for utopian approaches to poverty alleviation, and I look forward to reading the White Mans Burden to see what Easterly constructs in their place.  Unfortunately I&#039;m not sure that it&#039;s adequate to tear something down if you really don&#039;t have anything to put in its place in this particular instance, since it doesn&#039;t really offer a solid basis for advocacy, particularly when dealing with the big international organisations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right in his analysis, and it strikes me that a lot of his critics have got Easterly wrong on that count.  I&#8217;ve got no love for utopian approaches to poverty alleviation, and I look forward to reading the White Mans Burden to see what Easterly constructs in their place.  Unfortunately I&#8217;m not sure that it&#8217;s adequate to tear something down if you really don&#8217;t have anything to put in its place in this particular instance, since it doesn&#8217;t really offer a solid basis for advocacy, particularly when dealing with the big international organisations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.humanitarian.info/2006/04/06/william-easterley-versus-the-world-bank/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 12:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humanitarian.info/2006/04/06/william-easterley-versus-the-world-bank/#comment-57</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I am finding the debates around the Easterly/Sachs very thought-provoking. I had been looking for that Post exchange. Thanks!</p>
<p>I am almost finished with Easterly&#8217;s White Man&#8217;s Burden. I, too, can&#8217;t agree with everything, but respect his general position to *not* take a position – &#8220;The right plan is to have no plan.&#8221; Many of the reviews seem to miss this point and criticize Easterly for being critical with little to offer as an alternative, which he does on purpose, I think, to push the debate and put the so-called &#8220;Planners&#8221; on the spot. (I do not really like the Searcher/Planner divide since I think all people in this field are part Searcher and part Planner.) </p>
<p>I need to re-read a few sections and I may be wrong, but I do not think he is saying evaluation is an end goal, but rather part of a cycle that needs to be acted upon rather than done for the sake of checking boxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
